Recommended articles
What is shared custody and when is it established in Brazil?
Shared custody in Brazil is a model of joint exercise of parental authority over children, in which both parents participate equally in making important decisions that affect the lives of the children, as well as in their care, education and development. It is established in cases in which the active participation of both parents is considered beneficial for the comprehensive development of the children and that both parents are capable of exercising parental authority in a responsible and collaborative manner.
Can judicial records influence participation in research projects in neuroscience applied to education in Colombia?
In research projects in neuroscience applied to education, judicial records can be considered to ensure the integrity and reliability of those involved in initiatives that seek to understand and improve learning processes.
Can a person with a judicial record be excluded from selection for a scholarship or grant in Peru?
Scholarships and grants in Peru may have specific requirements, and in some cases, an applicant's judicial record may influence selection. Scholarship awarding organizations may consider the applicant's suitability and background before making a decision. This may vary depending on the specific cause or grant.
How is civil society involved in the supervision and evaluation of the implementation of regulations for exposed people in Paraguay?
Civil society in Paraguay is actively involved in monitoring and evaluating the implementation of regulations for exposed people, participating in consultation processes and providing valuable feedback.
What is the Venezuelan government's policy to prevent and combat corruption?
The Venezuelan government has established policies and measures to prevent and combat corruption in the country. Anti-corruption institutions and laws have been created, transparency in public management has been promoted, and control and accountability mechanisms have been implemented. However, challenges remain regarding the effectiveness of these policies and the prosecution of high-profile corruption cases.
How are situations in which PEPs argue diplomatic immunity to avoid financial supervision in Argentina handled?
In situations where PEPs argue diplomatic immunity to circumvent financial oversight in Argentina, a careful approach is followed that balances the integrity of the financial system with diplomatic standards. Protocols are established that allow collaboration with diplomatic authorities to address possible illicit activities without compromising international relations. Transparency and effective cooperation are key to resolving these cases, ensuring that financial oversight is applied fairly and effectively, even in situations involving figures with diplomatic immunity.
Other profiles similar to Oscar Jesus Ovaciandia Peña