Recommended articles
What is the difference between an embargo and a confiscation in Guatemala?
In Guatemala, the difference between an embargo and a confiscation lies in their nature and purpose. An embargo involves the temporary restriction or prohibition of certain goods or assets as a precautionary measure or to guarantee compliance with an obligation. On the other hand, confiscation is the action of permanently seizing property or assets due to their relationship with an illegal or criminal activity. While a seizure can be lifted once certain conditions are met, confiscation involves a permanent loss of property.
What are the requirements to apply for maternity benefits in Colombia?
The requirements to apply for maternity benefits in Colombia vary depending on the program and the established conditions. In general, you must be affiliated with the social security system in
What are the regulations that address crimes related to drug trafficking in El Salvador?
The Law on Control and Regulation of Drug Related Activities regulates crimes related to drug trafficking and establishes specific sanctions for these cases.
What is intellectual property law in Mexico?
Intellectual property law regulates the protection of copyrights, patents, trademarks, industrial designs and other rights related to creativity and innovation, guaranteeing the protection and commercial exploitation of intellectual works and creations.
How are relationships with third parties, such as suppliers or subcontractors, regulated in a sales contract in Argentina?
In an Argentine sales contract, relationships with third parties, such as suppliers or subcontractors, must be regulated by specific clauses. This may include notification and approval of third party participation, as well as associated responsibilities and obligations.
What rights do third parties have who have acquired seized assets in Costa Rica?
Third parties who have acquired seized assets in Costa Rica may have rights over those assets if they meet certain legal requirements. The law establishes that third parties who have acquired seized property in good faith and for a reasonable value may have protected rights, as long as they acquired the property before the seizure was registered in the National Registry. The acquisition of assets seized by third parties must comply with legal requirements and be prior to the registration of the seizure to be legally recognized.
Other profiles similar to Roque Asdrubal Aguilar