Recommended articles
What is the difference between a preventive seizure and an executive seizure in Peru?
In Peru, the preventive embargo is a precautionary measure that is issued before there is a final sentence. Its objective is to ensure compliance with an eventual judgment favorable to the creditor. On the other hand, the executive embargo is imposed once there is already a judgment or judicial resolution that determines a debt and its forced execution.
Can an asset that is the subject of a pledge contract be seized in Chile?
If an asset is subject to a pledge contract in Chile, the creditor has a preferential right over that asset in the event of default by the debtor. In the event of seizure, the property may be subject to the execution of the pledge to satisfy the outstanding debt.
How is identity validation approached in the digital sphere in Costa Rica?
Identity validation in the digital sphere is carried out mainly through digital signature and secure authentication systems, supported by current legislation that recognizes the legal validity of electronic transactions.
What is the inheritance challenge action in Mexican civil law?
The action to challenge inheritance is the right that heirs or interested third parties have to challenge the validity of a testamentary disposition or the distribution of the assets of an inheritance.
How are non-compliance risks related to occupational health and safety managed in Mexican companies?
The management of risks of non-compliance with safety and health at work involves the identification of hazards, the implementation of prevention programs, the training of personnel and the continuous evaluation of compliance with regulations such as the Federal Labor Law and NOM-035- STPS.
How are extradition cases handled when there are discrepancies between national legislation and international treaties?
Extradition cases with discrepancies between national legislation and international treaties are handled considering the hierarchy of legal norms. In Bolivia, ratified international treaties have constitutional status and prevail over contrary national legislation. Courts can base their decisions on international treaties and evaluate the legality of the extradition request according to those standards. The correct interpretation and application of national and international laws are essential to resolve these cases fairly and legally.
Other profiles similar to Yommer Jose Velasquez Rodriguez