Recommended articles
What is the difference between preventive seizure and executive seizure in Mexico?
Mexico In Mexico, preventive seizure refers to a precautionary measure that is requested before a final judgment is issued in a trial. Its purpose is to secure the defendant's assets during the legal process. On the other hand, the executive seizure is one that is executed once a final and firm judgment has been obtained that orders the payment of a debt. In this case, the seizure is carried out to ensure the execution of the judgment and compliance with the obligation.
How is the order of priority determined in the auction of seized assets in Peru?
In an auction of seized assets in Peru, an order of priority established by law is generally followed. Legal costs, tax debts, and garnishment expenses are prioritized for payment before the remainder is used to pay other debts.
What is the role of the Insurance Superintendency in regulatory compliance in the insurance sector of the Dominican Republic?
The Insurance Superintendence is the regulatory entity in charge of supervising and regulating the insurance sector in the Dominican Republic. Its role is to ensure the stability and soundness of the insurance industry and protect the rights of policyholders. Insurance companies must comply with their regulations and standards
How is the problem of human trafficking addressed in the Mexican justice system?
Human trafficking is addressed in the Mexican justice system through the implementation of specialized laws and protocols, the training of judicial operators, the protection of victims, and inter-institutional coordination to investigate and prosecute those responsible for this crime.
What measures are taken against sexual harassment in the Costa Rican workplace?
Sexual harassment in the workplace in Costa Rica can result in civil and criminal sanctions, including loss of employment.
What is the position of Paraguayan legislation on the participation of minors in cases of de facto unions in family situations?
The participation of minors in cases of de facto unions may be recognized by Paraguayan legislation. Courts may consider the views of minors when addressing issues related to their parents' common-law union, especially if it impacts their well-being.
Other profiles similar to Greis Carolina Suarez Castillo