Recommended articles
Can the debtor request a review of the seizure in Panama if he or she considers that the amount seized is excessive or disproportionate?
Yes, the debtor can request a review of the seizure in Panama if they consider that the amount seized is excessive or disproportionate. If the debtor can demonstrate to the court that the amount garnished exceeds the fair and reasonable amount to cover the outstanding debt, the debtor may file a petition for review to adjust the garnishment amount based on the debtor's financial circumstances and ability to pay.
What is considered illicit enrichment in the context of Politically Exposed Persons in Brazil?
Illicit enrichment refers to a significant and unjustified increase in the assets of a Politically Exposed Person in Brazil while holding public office. If illicit enrichment is suspected, investigations are carried out to determine if there is evidence of corruption or embezzlement.
Can assets that are in judicial custody in Brazil be seized?
In general, assets that are in judicial custody in Brazil may be subject to seizure. If the assets are being administered by a judicial custodian or are in the possession of the court, they can be seized to ensure compliance with the debt. However, there are specific exceptions and regulations that may apply in certain circumstances.
Can I request an extension of the deadline to present evidence during the seizure process in Colombia?
Yes, you can request an extension of the deadline to present evidence during the seizure process in Colombia. If you need more time to gather evidence and prepare your defense, you can apply to the court to request an extension of time. You must provide a valid justification for the request and explain why you need more time. The court will evaluate the request and make a decision based on the circumstances of the case.
What is the legal framework for labor disputes in Panama?
Labor disputes in Panama are regulated by the Labor Code and other labor laws. In the event of labor disputes, mediation, conciliation or arbitration can be used, and ultimately, the labor courts can be used to resolve the conflict.
How does the Ombudsman's Office in Panama address complicity in cases of human rights violations and guarantee the protection of vulnerable people?
The Ombudsman's Office in Panama addresses complicity in cases of human rights violations through the investigation and denunciation of practices that involve accomplices in acts that violate fundamental rights. Its main function is to protect the rights of vulnerable people and can collaborate with other entities to ensure justice and punish those involved in complicity in human rights violations. The Ombudsman's Office contributes to the defense of fundamental rights and the prosecution of complicity in situations of vulnerability.
Other profiles similar to Gricelis Aroli Gamarra Montero